Paper detail

Vortex core near planar defects in a clean layered superconductor

We investigate the structure of quasiparticle states localized in a core of an Abrikosov vortex in a clean layered superconductor in the presence of planar defects. It is shown that even a highly transparent defect opens a minigap at the Fermi energy. Its magnitude, $E_g\simΔ\sqrt{R}$, exceeds the mean level spacing for the chiral branch, $ω_0\simΔ^2/E_F$, already for very small values of the reflection coefficient off the defect, $R\ll1$ ($Δ$ is the bulk gap). For $R\gtrsim\sqrt{Δ/E_F}$, formation of the minigap is accompanied by the appearance of subgap states localized along the defect, in accordance with [A. V. Samokhvalov \emph{et al.}, Phys.\ Rev.\ B \textbf{102}, 174501 (2020)]. The minigap takes its maximal value for the vortex located right at the defect, decreases with increasing the distance $b$ from the defect, and closes when $k_Fb\sim (Δ/ω_0)\sqrt{R}$. We also study various configurations of several planar defects (few crossing planes, stars, periodic structures). Although the minigap remains, a strong commensurability effect is observed. For two crossing planar defects, the magnitude of the minigap strongly depends on how close the intersection angle is to a rational fraction of $π$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.