Paper detail

Volume fraction determination of microgel composed of interpenetrating polymer networks of PNIPAM and polyacrylic acid

Interpenetrated polymer network microgels, composed of crosslinked networks of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and polyacrylic acid (PAAc), have been investigated through rheological measurements at four different amounts of polyacrylic acid. Both PAAc content and crosslinking degree modify particle dimensions, mass and softness, thereby strongly affecting the volume fraction and the system viscosity. Here the volume fraction is derived from the flow curves at low concentrations by fitting the zero-shear viscosity with the Einstein-Batchelor equation which provides a parameter k to shift weight concentration to volume fraction. We find that particles with higher PAAc content and crosslinker are characterized by a greater value of k and therefore by larger volume fractions when compared to softer particles. The packing fractions obtained from rheological measurements are compared with those from static light scattering for two PAAc contents revealing a good agreement. Moreover, the behaviour of the viscosity as a function of packing fraction, at room temperature, has highlighted an Arrhenius dependence for microgels synthesized with low PAAc content and a Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann dependence for the highest investigated PAAc concentration. A comparison with the hard spheres behaviour indicates a steepest increase of the viscosity with decreasing particles softness. Finally, the volume fraction dependence of the viscosity at a fixed PAAc and at two different temperatures, below and above the volume phase transition, shows a quantitative agreement with the structural relaxation time measured through dynamic light scattering indicating that IPN microgels softness can be tuned with PAAc and temperature and that, depending on particle softness, two different routes are followed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.