Paper detail

Volume entropy for minimal presentations of surface groups in all ranks

We study the volume entropy of a class of presentations (including the classical ones) for all surface groups, called \emph{minimal geometric presentations}. We rediscover a formula first obtained by Cannon and Wagreich with the computation in a non published manuscript by Cannon. The result is surprising: an explicit polynomial of degree $n$, the rank of the group, encodes the volume entropy of all classical presentations of surface groups. The approach we use is completely different. It is based on a dynamical system construction following an idea due to Bowen and Series and extended to all geometric presentations in. The result is an explicit formula for the volume entropy of minimal presentations for all surface groups, showing a polynomial dependence in the rank $n>2$. We prove that for a surface group $G_n$ of rank $n$ with a classical presentation $P_n$ the volume entropy is $\log(λ_n)$, where $λ_n$ is the unique real root larger than one of the polynomial \[ x^{n} - 2(n - 1) \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} x^{j} + 1. \]

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.