Paper detail

Volatile and refractory abundances of solar analogs with planets

We present a detailed abundance analysis of high-quality HARPS, UVES and UES spectra of 95 solar analogs, 33 with and 62 without detected planets. These spectra have S/N > 350. We investigate the possibility that the possible presence of terrestrial planets could affect the volatile-to-refratory abundance ratios. We do not see clear differences between stars with and without planets, either in the only seven solar twins or even when considering the whole sample of 95 solar analogs in the metallicity range -0.3< [Fe/H] < 0.5 . We demonstrate that after removing the Galactic chemical evolution effects the possible differences between stars with and without planets in these samples practically disappear and the volatile-to-refractory abundance ratios are very similar to solar values. We investigate the abundance ratios of volatile and refractory elements versus the condensation temperature of this sample of solar analogs, in particular, paying a special attention to those stars harbouring super-Earth-like planets.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.