Paper detail

Voigt-Profile Analysis of the Lyman-alpha Forest in a Cold Dark Matter Universe

We use an automated Voigt-profile fitting procedure to extract statistical properties of the Ly$α$ forest in a numerical simulation of an $Ω=1$, cold dark matter (CDM) universe. Our analysis method is similar to that used in most observational studies of the forest, and we compare the simulations to recently published results derived from Keck HIRES spectra. With the Voigt-profile decomposition analysis, the simulation reproduces the large number of weak lines ($N_{\rm HI}\la 10^{13}\cdunits$) found in the HIRES spectra. The column density distribution evolves significantly between $z=3$ and $z=2$, with the number of lines at fixed column density dropping by a factor $\sim 1.6$ in the range where line blending is not severe. At $z=3$, the $b$-parameter distribution has a median of $35 \kms$ and a dispersion of $20 \kms$, in reasonable agreement with the observed values. The comparison between our new analysis and recent data strengthens earlier claims that the \lya forest arises naturally in hierarchical structure formation as photoionized gas falls into dark matter potential wells. However, there are two statistically signficant discrepancies between the simulated forest and the HIRES results: the model produces too many lines at $z=3$ by a factor $\sim 1.5-2$, and it produces more narrow lines ($b<20 \kms$) than are seen in the data. The first result is sensitive to our adopted normalization of the mean \lya optical depth, and the second is sensitive to our assumption that helium reionization has not significantly raised gas temperatures at $z=3$. It is therefore too early to say whether these discrepancies indicate a fundamental problem with the high-redshift structure of the $Ω=1$ CDM model or reflect errors of detail in our modeling of the gas distribution or the observational procedure.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.