Paper detail

Void Probability Function of Simulated Surveys of high-redshift Lyman-Alpha Emitters

We calculate the void probability function (VPF) in simulations of Lyman-$α$ emitters (LAEs) across a wide redshift range ($z=3.1,\ 4.5,\ 5.7,\ 6.6$). The VPF measures the zero-point correlation function (i.e. places devoid of galaxies) and naturally connects to higher order correlation functions while being computationally simple to calculate. We explore the Poissonian and systematic errors on the VPF, specify its accuracy as a function of average source density and the volume probed, and provide the appropriate size scales to measure the VPF. At small radii the accuracy of the VPF is limited by galaxy density, while at large radii the VPF is limited by the number of independent volumes probed. We also offer guidelines for understanding and quantifying the error in the VPF. We approximate the error in the VPF by using independent sub-volumes of the catalogs, after finding that jackknife statistics underestimate the uncertainty. We use the VPF to probe the strength of higher order correlation functions by measuring and examining the hierarchical scaling between the correlation functions using count-in-cells. The negative binomial model (NBM) has been shown to best describe the scaling between the two point correlation function and VPF for low-redshift galaxy observations. We further test the fit of the NBM by directly deriving the volume averaged two-point correlation function from the VPF and vice versa. We find the NBM best describes the $z=3.1, 4.5, 5.7$ simulated LAEs, with a 1$σ$ deviation from the model in the $z=6.6$ catalog. This suggests that LAEs show higher order clustering terms similar to those of normal low redshift galaxies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.