Paper detail

Visualizing the Invisible using Polarisation Observations

An electromagnetic wave can be uniquely characterized by the four Stokes parameters: I, Q, U, and V. Typical observations in astronomy rely solely on total intensity measurements of the incoming radiation (Stokes I). However, a significant amount of information both about the emitting region and the propagation path is carried in the remaining Stokes parameters. These data provide a means to observe parts of the interstellar medium which remain invisible in Stokes I, at any wavelength. For example, when an electromagnetic wave propagates through a region containing free electrons and a magnetic field, the plane of polarisation of the wave will rotate - an effect recorded only in Stokes Q and U. The interstellar medium of the Galaxy is such a region, containing free electrons (observed as HII) and a magnetic field of a few microgauss. By imaging in Stokes Q and U we are able to observe signatures of magnetic field perturbations from the small scale (tens of pc) to the large scale (kpc). In this paper, we review the status of Canadian polarisation studies of cosmic magnetic fields and discuss the leading role Canada is playing in polarsation studies around the world.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.