Paper detail

Visual Word Selection without Re-Coding and Re-Pooling

The Bag-of-Words (BoW) representation is widely used in computer vision. The size of the codebook impacts the time and space complexity of the applications that use BoW. Thus, given a training set for a particular computer vision task, a key problem is pruning a large codebook to select only a subset of visual words. Evaluating possible selections of words to be included in the pruned codebook can be computationally prohibitive; in a brute-force scheme, evaluating each pruned codebook requires re-coding of all features extracted from training images to words in the candidate codebook and then re-pooling the words to obtain a representation of each image, e.g., histogram of visual word frequencies. In this paper, a method is proposed that selects and evaluates a subset of words from an initially large codebook, without the need for re-coding or re-pooling. Formulations are proposed for two commonly-used schemes: hard and soft (kernel) coding of visual words with average-pooling. The effectiveness of these formulations is evaluated on the 15 Scenes and Caltech 10 benchmarks.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.