Paper detail

VIRGO Newtonian-noise reassessment

The LIGO and Virgo scientific collaborations have cataloged ten confident detections from binary black holes and one from binary neutron stars in their first two observing runs, which has already brought up an immense desire among the scientists to study the universe and to extend the knowledge of astrophysics from these compact objects. One of the fundamental noise sources limiting the achievable detector bandwidth is given by Newtonian noise arising from terrestrial gravity fluctuations. It is important to model Newtonian noise spectra very accurately as it cannot be monitored directly using current technology. In this article, we show the reduction in the Newtonian noise curve obtained by more accurately modelling the current configuration of the Virgo observatory. In Virgo, there are clean rooms or recess like structures underneath each test mirror forming the main two Fabry-Perot arm cavities of the detector. We compute the displacements originating from an isotropic Rayleigh field including the recess structure. We find an overall strain noise reduction factor of 2 in the frequency band from 12 to about 15 Hz relative to previous models. The reduction factor depends on frequency and also varies between individual test masses.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.