Paper detail

Violations of Bell inequalities from random pure states

We consider the expected violations of Bell inequalities from random pure states. More precisely, we focus on a slightly generalised version of the CGLMP inequality, which concerns Bell experiments of two parties, two measurement options and N outcomes and analyse their expected quantum violations from random pure states for varying N, assuming the conjectured optimal measurement operators. It is seen that for small N the Bell inequality is not violated on average, while for larger N it is. Both ensembles of unstructured as well as structured random pure states are considered. Using techniques from random matrix theory this is obtained analytically for small and large N and numerically for intermediate N. The results show a beautiful interplay of different aspects of random matrix theory, ranging from the Marchenko-Pastur distribution and fixed-trace ensembles to the O(n) model.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.