Paper detail

View Composition Algebra for Ad Hoc Comparison

Comparison is a core task in visual analysis. Although there are numerous guidelines to help users design effective visualizations to aid known comparison tasks, there are few techniques available when users want to make ad hoc comparisons between marks, trends, or charts during data exploration and visual analysis. For instance, to compare voting count maps from different years, two stock trends in a line chart, or a scatterplot of country GDPs with a textual summary of the average GDP. Ideally, users can directly select the comparison targets and compare them, however what elements of a visualization should be candidate targets, which combinations of targets are safe to compare, and what comparison operations make sense? This paper proposes a conceptual model that lets users compose combinations of values, marks, legend elements, and charts using a set of composition operators that summarize, compute differences, merge, and model their operands. We further define a View Composition Algebra (VCA) that is compatible with datacube-based visualizations, derive an interaction design based on this algebra that supports ad hoc visual comparisons, and illustrate its utility through several use cases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.