Paper detail

Viable secret neutrino interactions with ultralight dark matter

Several anomalies in neutrino oscillation experiments point to the existence of a $\sim 1\,$eV sterile neutrino $ν_s$ mixing with $ν_e$ at the level of $U_{e4}\cong 0.1$, but such a neutrino is strongly disfavored by constraints on additional light degrees of freedom ($δN_{\rm eff}$) and total neutrino mass ($\sum_νm_ν$) from cosmology. "Secret neutrino interactions" that have been invoked to suppress the cosmological production of $ν_s$ typically falter, but recently it was pointed out that $ν_s$ could get a large mass in the early universe by coupling to ultralight dark matter $ϕ$, which can robustly suppress its production. The model has essentially two free parameters: $m_ϕ$, and $m_{s,0}$, the mass of the sterile neutrino at early times, enhanced by its coupling to $ϕ$. I determine the parameter regions allowed by limits on $δN_{\rm eff}$ and $\sum_νm_ν$ from the cosmic microwave background and big bang nucleosynthesis, using a simplified yet accurate treatment of neutrino oscillations in the early universe. This mechanism could have an important impact on laboratory experiments that suggest oscillations with sterile neutrinos.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.