Paper detail

Viable quark-lepton Yukawa ratios and nucleon decay predictions in $SU(5)$ GUTs with type-II seesaw

We investigate the viability of predictive schemes for quark-lepton Yukawa ratios and nucleon decay in non-supersymmetric SU(5) Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) where neutrino masses are generated by a type II seesaw mechanism. The scalar sector of the considered scenario contains 5-, 24- and 45-dimensional representations plus a 15-dimensional representation for realising the type II seesaw. Predictions for the ratios of the quark and lepton Yukawa couplings emerge when the relevant entries of the Yukawa matrices are generated from single joint GUT operators (i.e. under the condition of "single operator dominance"). Focusing on the 2nd and 3rd family and hierarchical Yukawa matrices, we show that only two sets of predictions, $\frac{y_τ}{y_b}=\frac{3}{2}$, $\frac{y_μ}{y_s}=\frac{9}{2}$ and $\frac{y_τ}{y_b}=2$, $\frac{y_μ}{y_s}=6$ are viable. To further investigate both options, we extend the minimal scenarios to two "toy models", including the 1st family of charged fermions, and calculate the models' predictions, e.g. for the nucleon decay rates and for the masses of the light relics that are potentially within reach of colliders.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.