Paper detail

Viability of complex self-interacting scalar field as dark matter

We study the viability of a complex scalar field $χ$ with self-interacting potential $ V = m^χ_0/2 \, |χ|^2 + h \, |χ|^4$ as dark matter. The scalar field is produced at reheating through the decay of the inflaton field and then, due to the self-interaction, a Bose-Einstein condensate of $χ$ particles forms. The condensate represents dark matter in that model. We analyze the cosmological evolution of the model, stressing how, due to the presence of the self-interaction, the model naturally admits dark matter domination at late times, thus avoiding any fine tuning on the energy density of the scalar field at early times. Finally we give a lower bound for the size of dark matter halos at present time and we show that our model is compatible with dark matter halos greater than $0.1 \, Kpc$ and with BBN and CMB bounds on the effective number of extra neutrinos $Δ_ν^{eff}$. Therefore, the model is viable and for $h\simeq 10^{-4}-10^{-12}$ one obtains a mass $m^χ\simeq m^χ_0 \simeq 1-10^{-2} \, eV$ for dark matter particles from radiation-matter equality epoch to present time, but at temperatures $T_γ\gg 10 \, eV$, where $T_γ$ is the photons temperature, thermal corrections to $m^χ_0$ due to the self-coupling $h$ are dominant.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.