Paper detail

Vetting Asteroseismic $Δν$ Measurements using Neural Networks

Precise asteroseismic parameters allow one to quickly estimate radius and mass distributions for large samples of stars. A number of automated methods are available to calculate the frequency of maximum acoustic power ($ν_{\mathrm{max}}$) and the frequency separation between overtone modes ($Δν$) from the power spectra of red giants. However, filtering through the results requires either manual vetting, elaborate averaging across multiple methods, or sharp cuts in certain parameters to ensure robust samples of stars free of outliers. Given the importance of ensemble studies for Galactic archaeology and the surge in data availability, faster methods for obtaining reliable asteroseismic parameters are desirable. We present a neural network classifier that vets $Δν$ by combining multiple features from the visual $Δν$ vetting process. Our classifier is able to analyse large numbers of stars determining whether their measured $Δν$ are reliable thus delivering clean samples of oscillating stars with minimal effort. Our classifier is independent of the method used to obtain $ν_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $Δν$, and therefore can be applied as a final step to any such method. Tests of our classifier's performance on manually vetted $Δν$ measurements reach an accuracy of 95%. We apply the method to giants observed by K2 Galactic Archaeology Program and find that our results retain stars with astrophysical oscillation parameters consistent with the parameter distributions already defined by well-characterised Kepler red giants.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.