Paper detail

Very Large Excesses of 18O in Hydrogen-Deficient Carbon and R Coronae Borealis Stars: Evidence for White Dwarf Mergers

We have found that at least seven hydrogen-deficient carbon (HdC) and R Coronae Borealis (RCB) stars, have 16O/18O ratios close to and in some cases less than unity, values that are orders of magnitude lower than measured in other stars (the Solar value is 500). Greatly enhanced 18O is evident in every HdC and RCB we have measured that is cool enough to have detectable CO bands. The three HdC stars measured have 16O/18O < 1, lower values than any of the RCB stars. These discoveries are important clues in determining the evolutionary pathways of HdC and RCB stars, for which two models have been proposed: the double degenerate (white dwarf (WD) merger), and the final helium-shell flash (FF). No overproduction of 18O is expected in the FF scenario. We have quantitatively explored the idea that HdC and RCB stars originate in the mergers of CO- and He-WDs. The merger process is estimated to take only a few days, with accretion rates of 150 Msun/ yr producing temperatures at the base of the accreted envelope of 1.2 - 1.9 x 10^8 K. Analysis of a simplified one-zone calculation shows that nucleosynthesis in the dynamically accreting material may provide a suitable environment for a significant production of 18O, leading to very low values of 16O/18O, similar to those observed. We also find qualitative agreement with observed values of 12C/13C and with the CNO elemental ratios. H-admixture during the accretion process from the small H-rich C/O WD envelope may play an important role in producing the observed abundances. Overall our analysis shows that WD mergers may very well be the progenitors of O18-rich RCB and HdC stars, and that more detailed simulations and modeling are justified.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.