Paper detail

Very Early Photometry of SN 1998S: Physical Parameters and Date of Explosion

Context. We present very early optical lightcurves beginning 10 days before maximum of the Type IIn supernova 1998S, covering the first four months after discovery. Aims. We examine the light evolution and try to compare the lightcurves to two analytical models(Nakar & Sari(2010) and Rabinak & Waxman(2011)) for a red supergiant star. Methods. The photometry was carried at the 60-cm telescope of the Xinglong Station of China. Broadband filters Johnsons B, V and Cousins R were used. Results. The magnitude rose for the first few days and then dropped slowly afterwards. The two different models we use can fit the early lightcurves very well. The explosion date derived from the models is within the range of 1998 March 1.34 - 2.64(JD 2450873.84 - JD 2450875.14.) The radius of the progenitor is found to be ~ 300 Rsun and ~ 2000 Rsun for the model of Nakar & Sari(2010) and Rabinak & Waxman(2011) respectively. The constraint on mass and energy is not strong. The ranges of these two parameters are within that of a red supergiant.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.