Paper detail

Vertical partitioning of relational OLTP databases using integer programming

A way to optimize performance of relational row store databases is to reduce the row widths by vertically partitioning tables into table fractions in order to minimize the number of irrelevant columns/attributes read by each transaction. This paper considers vertical partitioning algorithms for relational row-store OLTP databases with an H-store-like architecture, meaning that we would like to maximize the number of single-sited transactions. We present a model for the vertical partitioning problem that, given a schema together with a vertical partitioning and a workload, estimates the costs (bytes read/written by storage layer access methods and bytes transferred between sites) of evaluating the workload on the given partitioning. The cost model allows for arbitrarily prioritizing load balancing of sites vs. total cost minimization. We show that finding a minimum-cost vertical partitioning in this model is NP-hard and present two algorithms returning solutions in which single-sitedness of read queries is preserved while allowing column replication (which may allow a drastically reduced cost compared to disjoint partitioning). The first algorithm is a quadratic integer program that finds optimal minimum-cost solutions with respect to the model, and the second algorithm is a more scalable heuristic based on simulated annealing. Experiments show that the algorithms can reduce the cost of the model objective by 37% when applied to the TPC-C benchmark and the heuristic is shown to obtain solutions with cost close to the ones found using the quadratic program.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.