Paper detail

$\vert V_{cb} \vert$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ using lattice QCD and unitarity

The Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix element $|V_{cb}|$ is extracted from exclusive semileptonic $B \to D^{(*)}$ decays adopting a novel unitarity-based approach which allows to determine in a full non-perturbative way the relevant hadronic form factors (FFs) in the whole kinematical range. By using existing lattice computations of the $B \to D^{(*)}$ FFs at small recoil from FNAL/MILC and JLQCD Collaborations, we show that it is possible to extrapolate their behavior also at large recoil without assuming any specific momentum dependence and without constraining their shape using experimental data. Thus, we address the extraction of $|V_{cb}|$ from the experimental data on the semileptonic $B \to D^{(*)} \ell ν_\ell$ decays, obtaining $\vert V_{cb}\vert = (41.0 \pm 1.2 ) \cdot 10^{-3}$ from $B \to D$ using as input the final FNAL/MILC lattice data for the FFs and $|V_{cb}| = (40.4 \pm 1.8 ) \cdot 10^{-3}$ from $B \to D^*$ using the preliminary JLQCD lattice data. Our result from $B \to D$ is consistent within $\sim 1$ standard deviation with the most recent inclusive determination $|V_{cb}|_{incl} = (42.00 \pm 0.65) \cdot 10^{-3}$. The resulting uncertainty is comparable with those obtained in literature using experimental data to constrain the shape of the FFs. Our result from $B \to D^*$, though consistent with $|V_{cb}|_{incl} $, is still based on preliminary lattice data for the FFs and its uncertainty is greater than the ones obtained in literature using experimental data to constrain the shape of the FFs. We investigate also the issue of Lepton Flavor Universality thanks to new theoretical estimates of the ratios $R(D^{(*)})$, namely $R(D) = 0.296(8)$ using final FNAL/MILC lattice results, and $R(D^{*}) = 0.261(20)$ using preliminary JLQCD and FNAL/MILC lattice data. Our findings differ by $\sim 1.4σ$ from the latest experimental determinations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.