Paper detail

Verifying the self-affine nature of regional seismicity using nonextensive Tsallis statistics

The aspect of self-affine nature of faulting and fracture is widely documented from the data analysis of both field observations and laboratory experiments. In this direction, Huang and Turcotte have stated that the statistics of regional seismicity could be merely a macroscopic reflection of the physical processes in earthquake source, namely, the activation of a single fault is a reduced self-affine image of regional seismicity. This work verifies the aforementioned proposal. More precisely we show that the population of: (i) the earthquakes that precede of a significant event and occur around its the epicentre, and (ii) the "fracto-electromagnetic earthquakes" that are emerged during the fracture of strong entities distributed along the activated single fault sustaining the system follow the same statistics, namely, the relative cumulative number of earthquakes against magnitude. The analysis is mainly performed by means of a recently introduced nonextensive model for earthquake dynamics which leads to a Gutenberg-Richter type law. We examine the variation of the parameters $q$ and $α$, which are included in the nonextensive law, for different thresholds of magnitude and different radius around the epicentre. Such analysis enhances the physical background of the underlying self-affinity. The parameter $q$ describes the deviation of Tsallis entropy from the extensive Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy, and $α$ is the constant of proportionality between the energy released during the fracture of a fragment and its size.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.