Paper detail

Verification of shielding effect predictions for large area field emitters

A recent analytical model for large area field emitters, based on the line charge model (LCM), provides a simple approximate formula for the field enhancement on hemi-ellipsoidal emitter tips in terms of the ratio of emitter height and pairwise distance between neighboring emitters. The formula, verified against the exact solution of the linear LCM, was found to be adequate provided the mean separation between emitters is larger than half the emitter height. In this paper, we subject the analytical predictions to a more stringent test by simulating (i) an infinite regular array and (ii) an isolated cluster of 10 random emitters, using the finite element software COMSOL. In case of the array, the error in apex field enhancement factor (AFEF) is found to be less than $0.25\%$ for an infinite array when the lattice constant $c \geq 1.5h$, increasing to $2.9\%$ for $c = h$ and $8.1\%$ for $c = 0.75h$. For an isolated random cluster of 10 emitters, the error in large AFEF values is found to be small. Thus, the error in net emitted current is small for a random cluster compared to a regular infinite array with the same (mean) spacing. The line charge model thus provides a reasonable analytical tool for optimizing a large area field emitter.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.