Paper detail

Verification of phased Dicke states

Dicke states are typical examples of quantum states with genuine multipartite entanglement. They are valuable resources in many quantum information processing tasks, including multiparty quantum communication and quantum metrology. Phased Dicke states are a generalization of Dicke states and include antisymmetric basis states as a special example. These states are useful in atomic and molecular physics besides quantum information processing. Here we propose practical and efficient protocols based on adaptive local projective measurements for verifying all phased Dicke states, including $W$ states and qudit Dicke states. To verify any $n$-partite phased Dicke state within infidelity $ε$ and significance level $δ$, the number of tests required is only $O(nε^{-1}\lnδ^{-1})$, which is linear in $n$ and is exponentially more efficient than traditional tomographic approaches. In the case of $W$ states, the number of tests can be further reduced to $O(\sqrt{n}\,ε^{-1}\lnδ^{-1})$. Moreover, we construct an optimal protocol for any antisymmetric basis state; the number of tests required decreases (rather than increases) monotonically with $n$. This is the only optimal protocol known for multipartite nonstabilizer states.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.