Paper detail

Verification of atomic data for He- and Li-like ions employing K-spectra from the tokamak plasma

X-ray emission K-spectra of highly charged He- and Li-like argon ions recorded with high spectral, spatial, and temporal resolution at the TEXTOR tokamak were employed to develop a self-consistent approach (SCA) for deriving information on plasma parameters and the verification (estimation of accuracy) of both atomic data, needed for spectra interpretation, and methods of their calculation. The approach is based on solving the spectral inverse problem for these spectra in the framework of the semi-empirical ``spectroscopic model'' (SM) by means of two complimentary inversion methods. The SCA was justified by comparing and analyzing measured and synthetic spectra on the basis of the calculated and corrected atomic data. The three different sets of atomic data for He- and Li-like argon ions were analyzed and verified. The SCA allowed us to verify the methods for calculating the atomic data with an accuracy within of 5--10\%. The spectra calculated with corrected atomic data are in agreement with the spectra measured in the wide range of plasma conditions within the experimental accuracy of 10\%. Corrected atomic data made it possible to perform an accurate diagnostics of plasma parameters: plasma temperatures and relative ion abundances in the tokamak plasma. This procedure provided also a method for determining the temperature of the plasma core with high accuracy within 5\% in a good agreement with the diagnostics technique based on the electron cyclotron emission. The relative ion abundances obtained by the application of the spectroscopic and impurity transport model are in agreement within the experimental errors. The presented results show that the X-ray spectroscopy of tokamak plasma is an effective tool for both high accuracy verification of atomic data and precision plasma diagnostics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.