Paper detail

Verbal Perception and the Word Length Effect

A theoretical framework is proposed for the understanding of verbal perception -- the conversion of words into meaning, modeled as a compromise between lexical demands and contextual constraints -- and the theory is tested against experiments on short-term memory. The observation that lists of short words are recalled better than lists of long ones has been a long-standing subject of controversy, further complicated by the apparent inversion of the effect for mixed lists. In the framework here proposed, these behaviors emerge as an effect of the different level of localization of short and long words in semantic space. Events corresponding to the recognition of a nonlocal word have a clustering property in phase space, which facilitates associative retrieval. The standard word-length effect arises directly from this property, and the inverse effect from its breakdown. An analysis of data from the PEERS experiments (Healey and Kahana, 2016) confirms the main predictions of the theory. Further predictions are listed and new experiments are proposed. Finally, an interpretation of the above results is presented.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.