Paper detail

VER J2227+608: A Hadronic PeVatron Pulsar Wind Nebula?

We report the detection of GeV $γ$-ray emission from the very-high-energy (VHE) $γ$-ray source VER J2227+608 associated with the "tail" region of SNR G106.3+2.7. The GeV $γ$-ray emission is extended and spatially coincident with molecular clouds traced by CO emission. The broadband GeV to TeV emission of VER J2227+608 can be well fitted by a single power-law function with an index of 1.90$\pm$0.04, without obvious indication of spectral cutoff toward high energies. The pure leptonic model for the $γ$-ray emission can be marginally ruled out by the X-ray and TeV data. In the hadronic model, the low energy content of CRs and the hard $γ$-ray spectrum, in combination with the center-bright source structure, suggest that VER J2227+608 may be powered by the PWN instead of shocks of the SNR. And the cutoff energy of the proton distribution needs to be higher than $\sim$ 400 TeV, which makes it an attractive PeVatron candidate. Future observations by the upcoming Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) and the Cherenkov Telescope Array in the north (CTA-North) could distinguish these models and constrain the maximum energy of cosmic rays in supernova remnants.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.