Paper detail

Velocity limits in the thermonuclear supernova ejection scenario for hypervelocity stars and the origin of US 708

Hypervelocity stars (HVS) are a class of stars moving at high enough velocities to be gravitationally unbound from the Galaxy. Ejection from a close binary system in which one of the components undergoes a thermonuclear supernova (SN) has emerged as a promising candidate production mechanism for the least massive specimens of this class. This study presents a thorough theoretical analysis of candidate progenitor systems of thermonuclear SNe in the single degenerate helium donor scenario in the relevant parameter space leading to the ejection of HVS. The primary goal is investigation of the, previously unclear, characteristics of the velocity spectra of the ejected component. Presented are the results of 390 binary model sequences computed with the MESA framework, investigating the evolution of supernova progenitors composed of a helium-rich hot subdwarf and a accreting white dwarf. Results are then correlated with an idealized kinematic analysis of the observed object US 708. It is seen that the ejection velocity spectra reach a maximum in the range $0.19~M_\odot < M_{HVS} < 0.25~M_\odot$. Depending on the local Galactic potential, all donors below $0.4~\text{M}_\odot$ are expected to become HVS. This channel is able to account for runaway velocities up to $\sim1150~\text{km s}^{-1}$ with a Chandrasekhar mass accretor, exceeding $1200~\text{km s}^{-1}$ if super-Chandrasekhar mass detonations are taken into account. It is found that the previously assumed mass of $0.3~M_\odot$ for US 708, combined with more recently obtained proper motions, favor a sub-Chandrasekhar mass explosion with a terminal WD mass between $1.1~M_\odot$ and $1.2~M_\odot$. The presence of clear ejection velocity maxima provides constraints on the terminal state of a supernova progenitor. It is possible to discern certain types of explosion mechanisms from the inferred ejection velocities alone.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.