Paper detail

Velocity Bias from the Small Scale Clustering of SDSS-III BOSS Galaxies

We present the measurements and modelling of the projected and redshift-space clustering of CMASS galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 11. For a volume-limited luminous red galaxy sample in the redshift range of $0.48<z<0.55$, we perform halo occupation distribution modelling of the small- and intermediate-scale ($0.1$--$60h^{-1}{\rm {Mpc}}$) projected and redshift-space two-point correlation functions, with an accurate model built on high resolution $N$-body simulations. To interpret the measured redshift-space distortions, the distribution of galaxy velocities must differ from that of the dark matter inside haloes of $\sim 10^{13}$--$10^{14}h^{-1}{\rm M_{\odot}}$, i.e. the data require the existence of galaxy velocity bias. Most notably, central galaxies on average are not at rest with respect to the core of their host haloes (defined by the inner 25% of particles around the halo potential minimum), but rather move around it with a 1D velocity dispersion of $0.22^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$ times that of the dark matter, implying a spatial offset from the centre at the level of $\lesssim$1% of the halo virial radius. The luminous satellite galaxies move more slowly than the dark matter, with velocities $0.86^{+0.08}_{-0.03}$ times those of the dark matter, which suggests that the velocity and spatial distributions of these satellites cannot both be unbiased. The constraints mainly arise from the Fingers-of-God effect at nonlinear scales and the smoothing to the Kaiser effect in the translinear regime; the robustness of the results is demonstrated by a variety of tests. In addition, no clear evidence is found for a strong luminosity dependence of the velocity bias. We discuss the implications of the existence of galaxy velocity bias for investigations of galaxy formation and cosmology.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.