Paper detail

Vector-valued statistics of binomial processes: Berry-Esseen bounds in the convex distance

We study the discrepancy between the distribution of a vector-valued functional of i.i.d. random elements and that of a Gaussian vector. Our main contribution is an explicit bound on the convex distance between the two distributions, holding in every dimension. Such a finding constitutes a substantial extension of the one-dimensional bounds deduced in Chatterjee (2007) and Lachièze-Rey and Peccati (2017), as well as of the multidimensional bounds for smooth test functions and indicators of rectangles derived, respectively, in Dung (2019), and Fang and Koike (2021). Our techniques involve the use of Stein's method, combined with a suitable adaptation of the recursive approach inaugurated by Schulte and Yukich (2017): this yields rates of converge that have a presumably optimal dependence on the sample size. We develop several applications of a geometric nature, among which is a new collection of multidimensional quantitative limit theorems for the intrinsic volumes associated with coverage processes in Euclidean spaces.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.