Paper detail

Vector Magnetic Fields and Current Helicities in Coronal Holes and Quiet Regions

In the solar photosphere, many properties of coronal holes (CHs) are not known, especially vector magnetic fields. Using observations from \emph{Hinode}, we investigate vector magnetic fields, current densities and current helicities in two CHs and compare them with two normal quiet regions (QRs) for the first time. We find that, in the CHs and QRs, the areas where large current helicities are located are mainly co-spatial with strong vertical and horizontal field elements both in shape and location. In the CHs, horizontal magnetic fields, inclination angles, current densities and current helicities are larger than those in the QRs. The mean vertical current density and current helicity, averaged over all the observed areas including the CHs and QRs, are approximately 0.008 A m$^{-2}$ and 0.005 G$^{2}$ m$^{-1}$, respectively. The mean current density in magnetic flux concentrations where the vertical fields are stronger than 100 G is as large as 0.012 $\pm$ 0.001 A m$^{-2}$, consistent with that in the flare productive active regions. Our results imply that the magnetic fields, especially the strong fields, both in the CHs and QRs are nonpotential.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.