Paper detail

Vector Condensate Model of Electroweak Interactions

Motivated by the fact that the Higgs is not seen, we have proposed a version of the standard model where the scalar doublet is replaced by a vector doublet and its neutral member forms a nonvanishing condensate. Gauge fields are coupled to the new vector fields B in a gauge invariant way leading to mass terms for the gauge fields by condensation. B-particles become massive because of their self interactions. Fermion and gauge field couplings are standard. Low energy charged current phenomenology fixes the condensate. Fermion masses are coming from the condensation and B-particle-fermion couplings. The Kobayashi-Maskawa description is unchanged. The model has a low mementum scale of about 2 TeV. For instance, from tree-graph unitarity at a scale of 1 TeV the minimum mass of a charged B-particle is 369 GeV. Such B-particles are shown to copiously produced at high-energy linear $e^+e^-$ colliders. The model survives the test of oblique radiative corrections. To each momentum scale there exists a range of B masses where the S, T parameters are compatible with the experiment. For instance, at a scale of 1 TeV from the S parameter the minimum mass of a charged (neutral) B is 200-350 GeV (400-550 GeV).

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.