Paper detail

VC density of set systems defnable in tree-like graphs

We study set systems definable in graphs using variants of logic with different expressive power. Our focus is on the notion of Vapnik-Chervonenkis density: the smallest possible degree of a polynomial bounding the cardinalities of restrictions of such set systems. On one hand, we prove that if $φ(\bar x,\bar y)$ is a fixed CMSO$_1$ formula and $\cal C$ is a class of graphs with uniformly bounded cliquewidth, then the set systems defined by $φ$ in graphs from $\cal C$ have VC density at most $|\bar y|$, which is the smallest bound that one could expect. We also show an analogous statement for the case when $φ(\bar x,\bar y)$ is a CMSO$_2$ formula and $\cal C$ is a class of graphs with uniformly bounded treewidth. We complement these results by showing that if $\cal C$ has unbounded cliquewidth (respectively, treewidth), then, under some mild technical assumptions on $\cal C$, the set systems definable by CMSO$_1$ (respectively, CMSO$_2$) formulas in graphs from $\cal C$ may have unbounded VC dimension, hence also unbounded VC density.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.