Paper detail

VaxEquity: A Data-Driven Risk Assessment and Optimization Framework for Equitable Vaccine Distribution

With the continuous rise of the COVID-19 cases worldwide, it is imperative to ensure that all those vulnerable countries lacking vaccine resources can receive sufficient support to contain the risks. COVAX is such an initiative operated by the WHO to supply vaccines to the most needed countries. One critical problem faced by the COVAX is how to distribute the limited amount of vaccines to these countries in the most efficient and equitable manner. This paper aims to address this challenge by first proposing a data-driven risk assessment and prediction model and then developing a decision-making framework to support the strategic vaccine distribution. The machine learning-based risk prediction model characterizes how the risk is influenced by the underlying essential factors, e.g., the vaccination level among the population in each COVAX country. This predictive model is then leveraged to design the optimal vaccine distribution strategy that simultaneously minimizes the resulting risks while maximizing the vaccination coverage in these countries targeted by COVAX. Finally, we corroborate the proposed framework using case studies with real-world data.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.