Paper detail

Variations of the Morse-Hedlund Theorem for $k$-Abelian Equivalence

In this paper we investigate local to global phenomena for a new family of complexity functions of infinite words indexed by $k \in \Ni \cup \{+\infty\}$ where $\Ni$ denotes the set of positive integers. Two finite words $u$ and $v$ in $A^*$ are said to be $k$-Abelian equivalent if for all $x \in A^*$ of length less than or equal to $k$, the number of occurrences of $x$ in $u$ is equal to the number of occurrences of $x$ in $v$. This defines a family of equivalence relations $\sim_k$ on $A^*$, bridging the gap between the usual notion of Abelian equivalence (when $k = 1$) and equality (when $k = +\infty$). Given an infinite word $w \in A^ω$, we consider the associated complexity function $\mathcal P^{(k)}_w : \Ni \rightarrow \Ni$ which counts the number of $k$-Abelian equivalence classes of factors of $w$ of length $n$. As a whole, these complexity functions have a number of common features: Each gives a characterization of periodicity in the context of bi-infinite words, and each can be used to characterize Sturmian words in the framework of aperiodic one-sided infinite words. Nevertheless, they also exhibit a number of striking differences, the study of which is one of the main topics of our paper.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.