Paper detail

Variation of Gini and Kolkata Indices with Saving Propensity in the Kinetic Exchange Model of Wealth Distribution: An Analytical Study

We study analytically the change in the wealth ($x$) distribution $P(x)$ against saving propensity $λ$ in a closed economy, using the Kinetic theory. We estimate the Gini ($g$) and Kolkata ($k)$ indices by deriving (using $P(x)$) the Lorenz function $L(f)$, giving the cumulative fraction $L$ of wealth possessed by fraction $f$ of the people ordered in ascending order of wealth. First, using the exact result for $P(x)$ when $λ= 0$ we derive $L(f)$, and from there the index values $g$ and $k$. We then proceed with an approximate gamma distribution form of $P(x)$ for non-zero values of $λ$. Then we derive the results for $g$ and $k$ at $λ= 0.25$ and as $λ\rightarrow 1$. We note that for $λ\rightarrow 1$ the wealth distribution $P(x)$ becomes a Dirac $δ$-function. Using this and assuming that form for larger values of $λ$ we proceed for an approximate estimate for $P(x)$ centered around the most probable wealth (a function of $λ$). We utilize this approximate form to evaluate $L(f)$, and using this along with the known analytical expression for $g$, we derive an analytical expression for $k(λ)$. These analytical results for $g$ and $k$ at different $λ$ are compared with numerical (Monte Carlo) results from the study of the Chakraborti-Chakrabarti model. Next we derive analytically a relation between $g$ and $k$. From the analytical expressions of $g$ and $k$, we proceed for a thermodynamic mapping to show that the former corresponds to entropy and the latter corresponds to the inverse temperature.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.