Paper detail

Variability of Moderate Luminosity Active Galactic Nuclei at z=0.36

We monitored 13 moderate luminosity active galactic nuclei at z=0.36 to measure flux variability, explore feasibility of reverberation mapping, and determine uncertainties on estimating black hole mass from single-epoch data. Spectra and images were obtained with approximately weekly cadence for up to 4 months, using the KAST spectrograph on the 3-m Shane Telescope. In broad band we detect peak-to-peak variations of 9-37% and rms variations of 2-10%. The observed flux variability in the g' band (rest-frame 2800-4000Å) is consistent with that in the r' band (rest-frame 4000-5200Å), but with larger amplitude. However, after correcting for stellar light dilution, using Hubble Space Telescope images, we find nuclear variability of 3-24% (rms variation) with similar amplitudes in the g' and r' bands within the errors. Intrinsic flux variability of the H$β$ line is also detected at the 3-13% level, after accounting for systematic errors on the spectrophotometry. This demonstrates that a reverberation mapping campaign beyond the local universe can be carried out with a 3-m class telescope, provided that sufficiently long light curves are obtained. Finally, we compare the H$β$ FWHM measured from mean spectra with that measured from single-epoch data, and find no bias but an rms scatter of 14%, mostly accounted for by the uncertainty on FWHM measurements. The propagated uncertainty on black hole mass estimates, due to the FWHM measurement errors using low S/N (10--15 per pixel) single-epoch spectra, is 30%.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.