Paper detail

Variability of Broad Emission Lines in High-Luminosity,High-Redshift Quasars

We examine the variability of the high-ionization Lyman alpha lambda 1216 broad emission line (BEL) in a sample of 61 high-luminosity, high-redshift quasars observed at two epochs by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. These bright objects lie in the redshift interval z=[2.5, 4.3] and have luminosities $3.4 \times 10^{45} \lesssim λL_λ \lesssim 3.4 \times 10^{46}$ erg/s at 1450A. Utilizing improved spectrophotometric flux calibrations relative to nearby compact stars observed simultaneously, we are able to measure the flux changes in Lyman alpha and the nearby continuum at two epochs. We find 20 objects that exhibit Lyman alpha BEL flux variability at a significance level greater than 5 sigma on time-scales ranging from days to years in the quasar rest frame. The results show that, although some earlier work showed no significant detections of Lyman alpha BEL flux changes in a quasar sample with even higher luminosity, variability is present and readily observable in the sample studied here. We also consider the CIV lambda1549 BEL. The lack of a strong correlation between Lyman alpha BEL variability and nearby continuum variability is consistent with the presence of a time lag between the variations, whereas the presence of a stronger correlation between Lyman alpha BEL variability and CIV BEL variability suggests that these BEL regions (BELRs) are at similar distances from the central ionizing source. Some interesting examples are high-lighted in the analysis, including a case where the flux of an Lyman alpha BEL increased by ~26% in 14 days in the quasar rest frame, suggesting that the BELR has the shape of a disc, which is being observed face-on. This work demonstrates that future campaigns of spectrophotometric monitoring can improve our understanding of the structure of the BELRs of high-luminosity, high-redshift quasars.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.