Paper detail

Variability in NGC 3201 giant stars and its impact on their spectroscopic [Fe/H] determination

We present the analysis of 34 light curves in $V$ and $I$ of 17 giant stars in the globular cluster NGC 3201, to check if such stars are variable and if their variability has some kind of impact on the iron abundance as obtained from spectroscopic measurements. First, we computed the Generalized Lomb-Scargle and Phase Dispersion Minimization periodograms on the sample to check if the stars were variables. In this way, 7 stars of the sample were found to be non-variable, 2 stars are considered as possible variables, and 8 stars were found to be variable, with periods ranging from $0.0881\pm0.0001$ to $0.5418\pm0.0027$ days. According to the literature, the variables have distinct values of $\text{[Fe I/H]}$: the 3 most metal-rich stars are in the RGB stage, one has an $\text{[Fe I/H]}=-1.37$ dex, while the other two have $\text{[Fe I/H]}=-1.31$ dex. The two most metal-poor variables have $\text{[Fe I/H]}=-1.61$ dex and $\text{[Fe I/H]}=-1.62$ dex, and are AGB stars; the remaining variables have $\text{[Fe I/H]}=-1.44$, $-1.48$, and $-1.50$ dex, the first two being RGB while the last is AGB star. On the other hand, stars that appear to be non-variables have $-1.56\leq\text{[Fe I/H]}\leq-1.40$. We conclude that variability somehow affects the spectroscopic determination of the iron content of giant stars in NGC 3201 increasing the iron spread of the cluster. If variability is not taken into account, this spread could be wrongly interpreted as due to an intrinsic iron spread affecting the stars of the cluster.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.