Paper detail

Variability in Blazars: Clues from PKS 2155-304

Rapid variability on a time scale much faster than the light-crossing time of the central supermassive black hole has been seen in TeV emission from the blazar PKS 2155-304. The most plausible explanation of this puzzling observation is that the radiating fluid in the relativistic jet is divided into a large number of sub-regions which move in random directions with relativistic speeds. We consider two versions of this "jets in a jet" model. In the first, the "subjets" model, stationary regions in the mean jet frame emit relativistic subjets that produce the observed radiation. The variability time scale is determined by the size of the sub-regions in the mean jet frame. This model, which is motivated by magnetic reconnection, has great difficulty explaining the observations in PKS 2155-304. In the alternate "turbulence" model, various sub-regions move relativistically in random directions and the variability time scale is determined by the size of these regions in their own comoving frames. This model fits the data much more comfortably. We consider collisions between TeV photons emitted from different sub-regions and find that, in both the subjets and turbulence models, the mean bulk Lorentz factor of the jet needs to be greater than 25 to avoid the pair catastrophe.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.