Paper detail

Van Lambalgen's theorem fails for some computable measure

Van Lambalgen's theorem states that a pair $(α,β)$ of bitsequences is Martin-Löf random if and only if $α$ is Martin-Löf random and $β$ is Martin-Löf random relative to $α$. In [Information and Computation 209.2 (2011): 183-197, Theorem 3.3], Hayato Takahashi generalized van Lambalgen's theorem for computable measures $P$ on a product of two Cantor spaces; he showed that the equivalence holds for each $β$ for which the conditional probability $P(\cdot | β)$ is computable. He asked whether this computability condition is necessary. We give a positive answer by providing a computable measure for which van Lambalgen's theorem fails. We also present a simple construction of a measure for which conditional measure is not computable. Such measures were first constructed by N. Ackerman, C. Freer and D. Roy in [Proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS), pp. 107-116. IEEE (2011)].

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.