Paper detail

Van der Waals stacked multilayer in-plane graphene/hexagonal boron nitride heterostructure: its interfacial thermal transport properties

Combining both vertical and in-plane two-dimensional (2D) heterostructures opens up the possibility to create an unprecedented architecture using 2D atomic layer building blocks. The thermal transport properties of such mixed heterostructures, critical to various applications in nanoelectronics, however, have not been thoroughly explored. Herein, we construct two configurations of multilayer in-plane graphene/hexagonal boron nitride (Gr/h-BN) heterostructures (i.e. mixed heterostructures) via weak van der Waals (vdW) interactions and systematically investigate the dependence of their interfacial thermal conductance (ITC) on the number of layers using non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) simulations. The computational results show that the ITC of two configurations of multilayer in-plane Gr/h-BN heterostructures (MIGHHs) decrease with increasing layer number n and both saturate at n = 3. And surprisingly, we find that the MIGHH is more advantageous to interfacial thermal transport than the monolayer in-plane Gr/h-BN heterostructure, which is in strong contrast to the commonly held notion that the multilayer structures of Gr and h-BN suppress the phonon transmission. The underlying physical mechanisms for these puzzling phenomena are probed through the analyses of heat flux, temperature jump, stress concentration factor, overlap of phonon vibrational spectra and phonon participation ratio. In particular, by changing the stacking angle of MIGHH, a higher ITC can be obtained due to the thermal rectification behavior. Furthermore, we find that the ITC in MIGHH can be well-regulated by controlling the coupling strength between layers. Our findings here are of significance for understanding the interfacial thermal transport behaviors of multilayer in-plane Gr/h-BN heterostructure, and are expected to attract extensive interest in exploring its new physics and applications.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.