Paper detail

Valuation and Hedging of Contracts with Funding Costs and Collateralization

The research presented in this work is motivated by recent papers by Brigo et al. (2011), Burgard and Kjaer (2009), Crépey (2012), Fujii and Takahashi (2010), Piterbarg (2010) and Pallavicini et al. (2012). Our goal is to provide a sound theoretical underpinning for some results presented in these papers by developing a unified framework for the non-linear approach to hedging and pricing of OTC financial contracts. We introduce a systematic approach to valuation and hedging in nonlinear markets, that is, in markets where cash flows of the financial contracts may depend on the hedging strategies. Our systematic approach allows to identify primary sources of and quantify various adjustment to valuation and hedging, primarily the funding and liquidity adjustment and credit risk adjustment. We propose a way to define no-arbitrage in such nonlinear markets, and we provide conditions that imply absence of arbitrage in some specific market trading models. Accordingly, we formulate a concept of no-arbitrage price, and we provide relevant (non-linear) BSDE that produces the no-arbitrage price in case when the contract's cash flows can be replicated.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.