Paper detail

Validity of the two-band model of bilayer and trilayer graphene in a magnetic field

The eigenstates of an electron in the chiral two-dimensional electron gas (C2DEG) formed in an AB-stacked bilayer or an ABC-stacked trilayer graphene is a spinor with $4$ or $6$ components respectively. These components give the amplitude of the wave function on the $4$ or $6$ carbon sites in the unit cell of the lattice. In the tight-binding approximation, the eigenenergies are thus found by diagonalizing a $4\times 4$ or a $6\times 6$ matrix. In the continuum approximation where the electron wave vector $% k<<1/a_{0},$ with $a_{0}$ the lattice constant of the graphene sheets, a common approximation is the two-band model\cite{McCann2006} (2BM)\ where the eigenstates for the bilayer and trilayer systems are described by a two-component spinor that gives the amplitude of the wave function on the two sites with low-energy $\left\vert E\right\vert <<γ_{1}$ where $% γ_{1}$ is the hopping energy between sites that are directly above one another in adjacent layers. The 2BM has been used extensively to study the phase diagram of the C2DEG in a magnetic field as well as its transport and optical properties. In this paper, we use a numerical approach to compute the eigenstates and Landau level energies of the full tight-binding model in the continuum approximation and compare them with the prediction of the 2BM when the magnetic field or an electrical bias between the outermost layers is varied. Our numerical analysis shows that the 2BM is a good approximation for bilayer graphene in a wide range of magnetic field and bias but mostly for Landau level $M=0.$ The applicability of the 2BM in trilayer graphene, even for level $M=0,$ is much more restricted. In this case, the 2BM\ fails to reproduce some of the level crossings that occur between the sub-levels of $M=0.$

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.