Paper detail

Validation of the Heuristic Model for the Electron Mobility in Dense Helium Gas

The investigation of the mobility \(μ\) of quasi-free electrons in dense, cold helium gas as a function of its density \(N\) is made difficult by the fact that a significant fraction of electrons is localized in low mobility bubbles. The measured mobility is a weighted average of the contributions of the slow electron bubbles, whose mobility is determined by hydrodynamics, and of the fast quasi-free electrons. A precise description of the fast electron mobility is thus required. In the past we have developed a heuristic model that proved succesful at rationalizing the electron mobility in argon and neon gases. In order to validate it, we have carried out new accurate %electron mobility measurements in helium gas in the temperature range $\textbf{26} \, \text{K} < \text{\em T} < \textbf{300}\,$K at densities, in which the presence of localized states is negligible. The analysis of these new data confirms the validity of the model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.