Paper detail

Validation of Sinus Drug Delivery Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Modeling with In Vitro Gamma Scintigraphy

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent and disruptive disease. Medical management including nasal steroid sprays is the primary treatment modality. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used to characterize sinonasal airflow and intranasal drug delivery; however, variation in simulation methods indicates a need for large scale CFD model validation. Methods: Anatomic reconstructions of pre and post-operative CT scans of 3 functional endoscopic sinus surgery patients were created in Mimics(TM). Fluid analysis and drug particle deposition modeling were conducted using CFD methods with Fluent(TM) in 18 cases. Models were 3D printed and in vitro studies were performed using Tc99-labeled Nasacort(TM). Gamma scintigraphy signals and CFD-modeled spray mass were post-processed in a superimposed grid and compared. Statistical analysis using overlap coefficients (OCs) evaluated similarities between computational and experimental distributions and Kendall&#39;s tau rank correlation coefficient was employed to test independence. Results: OCs revealed strong agreement in percent deposition and grid profiles between CFD models and experimental results (mean [range] for sagittal, axial, and coronal grids were 0.69 [0.57], 0.61 [0.49], and 0.78 [0.44], respectively). Kendall&#39;s tau values showed strong agreement (average 0.73) between distributions, which were statistically significant (p < 0.05) apart from a single coronal grid in one model and two sagittal grids of another. Conclusions: CFD modeling demonstrates statistical agreement with in vitro experimental results. This validation study is one of the largest of its kind and supports the applicability of CFD in accurately modeling nasal spray drug delivery and using computational methods to investigate means of improving clinical drug delivery.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.