Paper detail

Validation of LAMOST Stellar Parameters with the PASTEL Catalog

Recently the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) published its first data release (DR1), which is ranked as the largest stellar spectra dataset in the world so far. We combine the PASTEL catalog and SIMBAD radial velocities as a testing standard to validate the DR1 stellar parameters (effective temperature $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$, surface gravity $\log g$, metallicity $\mathrm{[Fe/H]}$ and radial velocity $V_{\mathrm{r}}$). Through cross-identification of the DR1 catalogs and the PASTEL catalog, we obtain a preliminary sample of 422 stars. After removal of stellar parameter measurements from problematic spectra and applying effective temperature constraints to the sample, we compare the stellar parameters from DR1 with those from PASTEL and SIMBAD to prove that the DR1 results are reliable in restricted $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$ ranges. We derive standard deviations of 110 K, 0.19 dex, 0.11 dex and 4.91 $\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$ , for $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$, $\log g$, $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]$ when $T_{\mathrm{eff}}<8000\,\mathrm{K}$, and for $V_{\mathrm{r}}$ when $T_{\mathrm{eff}}<10000\,\mathrm{K}$, respectively. Systematic errors are negligible except for that of $V_{\mathrm{r}}$. Besides, metallicities in DR1 are systematically higher than those in PASTEL, in the range of PASTEL $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]<-1.5$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.