Paper detail

Validating Planck SZ2 Clusters with Optical Counterparts

We perform an extensive analysis of optical counterparts of Planck PSZ2 clusters, considering matches with three recent catalogs built from SDSS data: AMF DR9, redMaPPer (v6.3) and Wen et al (WHL). We significantly extend the number of optical counterparts of detected Planck clusters, and characterize the optical properties when multiple identifications in different catalogs exist. For Planck clusters which already possess an external validation, we analyze the redshift assignment for both optical and X--ray determinations. We then analyze the Planck Cosmology sample and comment on redshift determination and potential mass mis-determinations due to alignment issues. Finally, we inspect the reconstructed $y$ map from Planck and reason on the detectability of optical clusters. Overall, AMF DR9 main (extended) finds 485 (511) optical matches, with 45 (55) previously unmatched PSZ2 clusters, to be compared with the 374 optical matches already present in PSZ2. 29 of the 55 previously unmatched clusters do not yet have a followup in the literature. 18 of these are found in more than one SDSS catalog with consistent redshifts. We provide redshift and mass estimates for the newly matched clusters, and discuss the comparison with the follow-ups, when present. We find good agreement between the redMaPPer and AMF DR9 redshift determinations. From the Planck Cosmology sample, we find 14 clusters which merit further investigation, and discuss possible alignment issues for 9 of these clusters. After inspecting the $y$ map, we provide a list of 229 optical clusters not included in the Planck PSZ2 catalog but showing a prominent $y$ signal. We have further investigated the 86 clusters with Planck S/N $>4.5$ using the MMF technique (applied to the Planck HFI maps), and were able to detect 20 new cluster candidates that are not included in the PSZ2 catalog.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.