Paper detail

Validating estimates of the growth rate of structure with modified gravity simulations

We perform a validation of estimates of the growth rate of structure, described by the parameter combination $fσ_8$, in modified gravity cosmologies. We consider an analysis pipeline based on the redshift-space distortion modelling of the clustering wedges statistic of the galaxy correlation function and apply it to mock catalogues of $Λ{\rm CDM}$ and the normal branch of DGP cosmologies. We employ a halo occupation distribution approach to construct our mocks, which we ensure resemble the CMASS sample from BOSS in terms of the total galaxy number density and large scale amplitude of the power spectrum monopole. We show that the clustering wedges model successfully recovers the true growth rate difference between DGP and $Λ{\rm CDM}$, even for cases with over 40\% enhancement in $fσ_8$ compared to $Λ{\rm CDM}$. The unbiased performance of the clustering wedges model allows us to use the growth rate values estimated from the BOSS DR12 data to constrain the cross-over scale $r_c$ of DGP gravity to $\left[r_cH_0\right]^{-1} < 0.97$ ($2σ$) or $r_c > 3090\ {\rm Mpc}/h$, cutting into the interesting region of parameter space with $r_c \sim H_0^{-1}$ using constraints from the growth of structure alone.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.