Paper detail

UWB patch antenna design and realization in the bandwidth 780 MHz to 4.22 GHz

The proposed UWB antenna covers mobile communications (GSM, EDG, UMTS(3G), LTE(4G)) and wireless networks (WIFI, WiMAX), within a theoretical bandwidth defined from 780MHz to 4.22GHz. The UWB antenna is designed and realized on a FR-4 substrate with an electrical permittivity of 4.4. It presents a 98.75% average analytical efficiency and an omnidirectional radiation within the previous bandwidth. The impedance excitation port is fixed at 50 Ohm according with the SMA impedance used in the practical part. The measured results are in good agreement with those obtained using CST and ADS softwares. The measured bandwidth, defined from 980MHz to 4.2GHz, presents an efficiency of 94.14%. Furthermore, the practical radiation diagram and the excitation port impedance stay the same as that the simulation one.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.