Paper detail

UV to submillimetre luminosity functions of TNG50 galaxies

We apply the radiative transfer (RT) code SKIRT on a sample of ~14000 low-redshift (z<= 0.1) galaxies extracted from the TNG50 simulation to enable an apples-to-apples comparison with observations. The RT procedure is calibrated via comparison of a subsample of TNG50 galaxies with the DustPedia observational sample: we compare several luminosity and colour scaling relations and spectral energy distributions in different specific SFR bins. We consistently derive galaxy luminosity functions for the TNG50 simulation in 14 broadband filters from UV to submillimetre wavelengths and investigate the effects of the aperture, orientation, radiative transfer recipe, and numerical resolution. We find that, while our TNG50+RT fiducial model agrees well with the observed luminosity functions at the knee (+/- 0.04 dex typical agreement), the TNG50+RT luminosity functions evaluated within 5R_1/2 are generally higher than observed at both the faint and bright ends, by 0.004 (total IR)-0.27 (UKIDSS H) dex and 0.12 (SPIRE250)-0.8 (GALEX FUV) dex, respectively. A change in the aperture does affect the bright end of the luminosity function, easily by up to 1 dex depending on the choice. However, we also find that the galaxy luminosity functions of a worse-resolution run of TNG50 (TNG50-2, with 8 times worse mass resolution than TNG50, similar to TNG100) are in better quantitative agreement with observational constraints. Finally, we publicly release the photometry for the TNG50 sample in 53 broadbands from FUV to submillimetre, in three orientations and four apertures, as well as galaxy spectral energy distributions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.