Paper detail

UV Slopes At All Redshifts Are Consistent with H=1 Stochastic Star Formation Histories

Multiple investigations support describing galaxy growth as a stochastic process with correlations over a range of timescales governed by a parameter, $H$, empirically and theoretically constrained to be near unity. Here, we show that the distribution of UV-slopes, $β$, derived from an ensemble of theoretical $H=1$ star formation histories (SFHs) is consistent with data at all redshifts $z\le 16$. At $z=0$, the median value $\langleβ_{H=1}\rangle=-2.27$ agrees well with the canonical $β_0=-2.23$ for local starbursts \citep{meurer1999}. At $4\lesssim z\lesssim16$, JWST data span the model distribution's 2nd to 98th percentiles. Values of $-2.8\le β\le -2.5$ should be common in early galaxies without reference to exotic stellar populations -- arising solely from a null hypothesis of $H=1$ for the underlying diversity of galaxy growth histories. Future data should be interpreted with this fact in mind.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.